Analysis of article The Minds Eye by Oliver Sacks

BRIGADIER GENERAL CHARLES W. SWEENEY Resigned Dec. 27, 1979      Brigadier General Charles W. Sweeney was conceived in Lowell, Mass., in 1919. He moved on from North Quincy High School (Mass.) in 1937. In the wake of moving on from secondary school, he went to night classes at Boston University and furthermore at Purdue University. Charles Sweeney joined the Army Air Corps as a flying cadet on April 28, 1941. Accepting his bonus as a pilot in the Army Air Corps as an aeronautics cadet on April 28, 1941. Accepting his bonus as a pilot in the Army Air Corps in December 1941, Lieutenant Sweeney went through two years at Jefferson Proving Grounds Ind. From the demonstrating grounds in 1943, Charles Sweeney, presently a commander, moved to Eglin Field, Fla., where he filled in as a tasks official and furthermore an aircraft tester.      In 1944 he was elevated to the position of major in the Army of the United States. Right now he was going about as a B-29 pilot educator at Grand Island, Neb. Later around the same time, Major Sweeney was reassigned to Wendover Field, Utah and it was here that he started working in the "Silver Plate" venture, the code name of the pilot and team preparing program for the coming World War II nuclear missions.      On May 4, 1945 (at 25 years old and with the position of major) Charles Sweeney became administrator of the 393d Bombardment Squadron, a B-29 unit, which seven weeks after the fact (on June, 1945) traveled to a base on Tinian in the Mariana Islands. It was during August 1945 that Major Sweeney flew the history-production missions and dropped the bomb which concluded World War II.      In November 1945, Major Sweeney and the 393d Bombardment Squadron got back to Roswell Air Force Base, N.M. His crucial Roswell was to prepare aircrews for a third nuclear strategic - a peacetime investigate Bikini. Only a couple of months after the fact on June 28, 1946, he was released from deployment ready with the position of lieutenant colonel.      Colonel Sweeney, on Feb. 21, 1956, was named wing leader by Governor Christian A. Herter. Likewise in 1956, the unit was again re-assigned as the 102d Air Defense Wing, and on April 6, 1956, Colonel Sweeney got his advancement to the position of brigadier general. 1958 saw the wing get its current assignment as the 102d Tactical Fighter Wing.      General Sweeney

Essay on the Roles of Trinculo and Stephano in The Tempest

The Roles of Trinculo and Stephano in The Tempest   â â Trinculo and Stephano have two significant jobs in The Tempest - lighthearted element and the topic of investigation. In light of this twofold nature to their characters, they are a higher priority than they at first show up.   â â â â â â â â â â The Tempest is a parody. The play may not appear to fit into the classification of parody as it exists today; yet in the seventeenth century satire was totally different. Positively, The Tempest could never be mistaken for an advanced TV satire - the craft of parody has developed too far.â The primary plot of the play - the plot including Prospero recovering his legitimate situation as the Duke of Milan - appear to be excessively genuine for a parody. The scenes containing Trinculo and Stephano, anyway are the special cases here - their scenes are a lot nearer to the cutting edge understanding of parody than most of the remainder of the play.   â â â â â â â â â â Trinculo and Stephano are presented in act II, scene II. This scene is practically unadulterated joke - the occasions are absolutely unreasonable yet are, notwithstanding, very entertaining: A decent portrayal of present day satire, actually. While the past scenes in the play have been generally genuine, itemizing the back-story, this scene is conspicuously visual satire - in the hands of a decent executive and great entertainers, it could transform into a diverting scene.â This scene shows Trinculo and Stephano's fundamental reason in the play - to give lighthearted element. As an immediate complexity to the overwhelming plotting and nearly genuine topics being investigated in different scenes, the scenes including these two men help the play's state of mind significantly. Without their effect on occasions, The Tempest would be significantly darker in tone.   â â â â â â â â â â If Trinculo and Stephano had been le... ...utilization of this twofold nature to their characters, they are a higher priority than they at first show up. It is for both these reasons that they are critical to the play all in all; without them the play would be feeling the loss of some significant perspectives which help make it the achievement it is.   Works Cited and Consulted: Essential Texts William Shakespeare, The Tempest, ed. Straightforward Kermode, with a presentation by Frank Kermode, (Arden, 1964) Montaigne, Selected Essays of Montaigne, trans. John Florio (1603) ed.Walter Kaiser, with a presentation by Walter Kaiser, (Riverside, 1964) Optional Texts Brief Breight, 'Treachery doth never succeed': The Tempest and the talk of conspiracy, Shakespeare Quarterly, 41, no.1, (1990) Eric Cheyfitz, The Poetics of Imperialism: Translation and Colonization from The Tempest to Tarzan, (Oxford University Press, 1991)

Nicolaus Copernicus Essay Example For Students

Nicolaus Copernicus Essay Nicolaus CopernicusNicolaus Copernicus, who lived from 1473 until 1543, is known for his thought that the sun is still at the focal point of the universe and that the earth and different planets all spin around it. This Polish space expert reformed convictions including the universe, making his contemplations dubious in his time, however basic information in our own (Westman). Prior to the hour of Copernicus, individuals had amazingly various perspectives on the universe. A Greek space expert named Ptolemy had his own hypothesis of the earth and its relationship with the sun and different planets. Around 140 AD, he concocted a framework that demonstrated the earth at the focal point of the universe with the sun and planets spinning around it in a circular shape (Reichenbach 15-17). Ptolemy additionally accepted that the earth stayed still and that the furthest circle contained the stars, which were fixed in space (Westman). Copernicuss hypothesis indicated the earth and different planets rotating around the sun in a roundabout movement. Simultaneously, the moon is pivoting around the earth too. Like Ptolemy, Copernicus accepted that the stars involved the locale most remote from the sun. Copernicus, be that as it may, never expressed whether these stars were in a fixed circle around the universe or in the event that they were dissipated all through space. In contrast to Ptolemys unmoving earth, Copernicus said the earth turns around itself every day, causing night and day (Armitage, 112-15). He likewise understood that the more noteworthy the good ways from the sun a planet was, the additional time it takes for that planet to totally spin around the sun (Westman). From the outset, Copernicus just intended to utilize his new framework as a simpler method to diagram the planets positions. Be that as it may, he clarified everything with such high detail and science that cosmologists around the hour of his passing started to think about whether his hypothesis may really be reality. He was careful to distribute his thoughts since he saw potential for inconvenience and conceivably even a sin charge from the Catholic Church, who emphatically put stock in Ptolemys earth-focused framework. At long last he was convinced to distribute it by a portion of his initial supporters. In doing as such, he devoted his attempts to Pope Paul III; maybe to get him and the Church on his side (Asimov, 54-55). Protestant pioneers, not Catholics, were the first to dismiss Copernicuss hypothesis. They said it conflicted with the lessons of the Bible that probably upheld the differentiating arrangement of Ptolemy. Notwithstanding this, Protestants were additionally a portion of the principal supporters of this sun-focused arrangement (Armitage, 125). Around seventy years after the fact, in 1616, the Catholic Church started to scrutinize the Copernican framework. Galileo, one of Copernicuss most noteworthy supporters, utilized his recently developed telescope to watch the planets and was firmly persuaded that Copernicus was completely right. The Church currently considered these to be as a danger to their convictions concerning the uniqueness of earth as Gods extraordinary creation, and before long cautioned Galileo not to help it. An Inquisition council looked into Copernicuss work and proclaimed it, and its help, an apostasy. Galileo was brought to preliminary by the Church in 1633, and had to reclaim all help of the Copernican arrangement. Because of his mature age and sickliness, Galileo did however they wanted was set under house capture for an incredible rest, where he had the option to proceed with significant logical revelations of his own (Armitage, 143-149). Presently Copernicuss sun focused hypothesis is did not address anymore. Through current science and arithmetic we have had the option to demonstrate his thoughts as reality. Copernicus couldn't genuinely demonstrate his thought in light of the fact that the best possible innovation (like the telescope) and abilities were not accessible to him. Truth be told, Copernicus seldom utilized his own sightings as a reason for his hypotheses (Asimov, 54). .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 , .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 .postImageUrl , .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 .focused content territory { min-stature: 80px; position: relative; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 , .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02:hover , .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02:visited , .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02:active { border:0!important; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 .clearfix:after { content: ; show: table; clear: both; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 { show: square; progress: foundation shading 250ms; webkit-change: foundation shading 250ms; width: 100%; obscurity: 1; change: darkness 250ms; webkit-change: mistiness 250ms; foundation shading: #95A5A6; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02:active , .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02:hover { murkiness: 1; progress: haziness 250ms; webkit-change: darkness 250ms; foundation shading: #2C3E50; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 .focused content region { width: 100%; position: relativ e; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 .ctaText { outskirt base: 0 strong #fff; shading: #2980B9; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: striking; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; content embellishment: underline; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 .postTitle { shading: #FFFFFF; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: 600; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; width: 100%; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 .ctaButton { foundation shading: #7F8C8D!important; shading: #2980B9; fringe: none; outskirt range: 3px; box-shadow: none; text dimension: 14px; textual style weight: intense; line-tallness: 26px; moz-fringe span: 3px; content adjust: focus; content adornment: none; content shadow: none; width: 80px; min-stature: 80px; foundation: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/modules/intelly-related-posts/resources/pictures/straightforward arrow.png)no-rehash; position: supreme; right: 0; top: 0; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02:hover .ctaButton { foundation shading: #34495E!important; } .u c04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02 .focused content { show: table; stature: 80px; cushioning left: 18px; top: 0; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02-content { show: table-cell; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; cushioning right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-adjust: center; width: 100%; } .uc04fd38303ffa66f049fd736f44b2f02:after { content: ; show: square; clear: both; } READ: Hamlet - Act 3 Summary EssayNicolaus Copernicus and his progressive thoughts caused a lot of debate and issues close to the finish of the Renaissance in Europe, yet they can likely be viewed as one of the most critical cosmic acknowledge ever constructed from the beginning of time. Copernicus changed musings including the universe, however science through and through. Because of his work and of other compelling researchers of his time, the Scientific Revolution in Europe started (Asimov, 55). This was when science split away from its limitations of traditional compositions and the Bible and took an increasingly prof itable way that brought endless new creations and disclosures that would influence people groups lives from that point on. A few results of the Scientific Revolution include: the beginnings of current material science, the telescope, the magnifying instrument, the thermometer, and the gauge. Despite the fact that the Copernicuss hypothesis of the universe was every now and again viewed as bogus many years prior, individuals from that point on would acknowledge this as basic information. Much to his dismay, however Nicolaus Copernicus would apparently turn into the reason for a limitless measure of unrests in space science, yet in logical speculation as a rule. Works CitedArmitage, Angus. The World of Copernicus. New York: The New American Library, 1947. Asimov, Isaac. Asimovs Biographical Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Nursery City, NY: Doubleday, 1964. Reichenbach, Hans. From Copernicus to Einstein. Trans. Ralph B. Winn. New York: Steingould Corp., 1942. Westman, Robert S. Copernicus, Nicolaus. Microsoft Encarta. 1995 ed.

American History X vs. Malcolm X

The motion pictures American History X and Malcolm X both tackle basic social issues apparent in the past just as in the present. These issues spin around race and culture, which is very much identified with issues like opportunity, singularity, separation, and social acknowledgment. In both the movies, these issues were not so much featured at the earliest reference point. Both Malcolm X and American History X demonstrated a socially negative beginning, similar to the association of Edward Norton in a White supremacist gathering, or Denzel Washington’s depiction of Malcolm X’s criminal past.But in spite of this, the film bounced back on the positive light through the acknowledge of the principle characters at certain focuses in the film. These acknowledge or snapshots of truth were groundbreaking encounters for Edward Norton and Denzel Washington, as they depict the defining moments in the life of the characters that they play in their separate motion pictures. In Amer ican History X, Edward Norton’s snapshots of truth happened to him when he was sent to jail, in the wake of killing a dark man who attempted to burglarize him. From the outset, the homicide wasn’t actually a serious deal to him, since his standards direct that it was the correct thing to do.As a racial oppressor, he considers himself to be a superior individual than the individual he executed, and that his deed was that of positive attitude. He was in any event, smiling when he was captured (Kaye). At the point when he was sent to jail, he understood that life was not just highly contrasting. He had the option to see the wrongs of what he thought was correct, and hence, he gradually removed himself from the fraternity and the convictions that he provided food for quite a while. He started connecting with individuals from different races, however it was hard for him, as he needed to endure the brutal methods of the individuals he dismissed from.Despite all these, he tur ned into a changed man, and in the long run wanted to carry on with a superior existence with his sibling. Then again, Denzel Washington had his snapshots of truth in the film Malcolm X, in a similar way as that of Norton in American History X. During his childhood, Denzel Washington carried on with an existence of wrongdoing in the roads. He was an individual from groups which had dealings with criminal operations. He was captured for burglary at once, and was then sent to jail (Lee). It was the life in jail that transformed him personally.He met a man who acquainted him with the Nation of Islam, and furthermore propelled him to move away from an existence of indecencies and wrongdoing. He quit drinking and smoking, and in the long run surrender to the Islamic ways that was acquainted with him. After jail, he kept on carrying on with a perfect life, and picked to impact others of his newly discovered quality. He additionally understood that race ought not be an issue in the public arena. Both the movies understood reality through their encounters. It was not just founded on the words or the impacts of others, yet in addition on the going with activities that they experienced.The lives they lived beforehand were bad by any stretch of the imagination, however it filled in as a correlation for them when they chose to live away from scorn and separation (Cyrus and Fiske-Rusciano). It was their encounters and colleagues in jail that caused them to understand reality with regards to their lives. They avoided away segregation, strength, and scorn, and grasped an existence of acknowledgment and opportunity, in spite of the critical outcomes that they looked toward the finish of the film. Reality that they saw demonstrated as exceptionally unexpected toward the finish of the films.In American History X, Norton’s sibling was shot dead by a dark posse part. Then again, Malcolm X was killed before giving a discourse for the general population. In spite of these, r eality that they discovered was not in the least delicate. On the off chance that they choose to return to their old selves and get payback on the individuals who treated them terribly, the pattern of contempt would simply proceed. Norton understood this in a hard hitting way. He had executed someone previously, presently it is come back to him when his sibling was slaughtered. Malcolm X had a criminal existence in his childhood, and at long last, he was assassinated.The truth that they discovered was solidified by these occasions. There is a requirement for a social acknowledgment so as to stop the pattern of disdain and brutality. This is reality. Edward Norton and Denzel Washington took in this fact the most difficult way possible. Works Cited Cyrus, Virginia, and Roberta Fiske-Rusciano. Encountering Race, Class, and Gender in the United States. Third Edition ed: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 2000. American History X. 1998. John Morrissey, October 23. Malcolm X. 1992. Preston L. Holmes, et al. , November 18.

MindMeister Wins Best Teaching and Learning Site Award

MindMeister Wins Best Teaching and Learning Site Award The American Association of School Librarians (AASL) has just named MindMeister as one of the Top 25 Web sites for Teaching and Learning, and naturally, were chuffed about the news. The list is a new resource honoring the top twenty-five Internet sites for enhancing learning and curriculum development and is considered the best of the best by AASL. Nice ?? The Top 25 Web sites for Teaching and Learning were named so because they foster the qualities of innovation, creativity, active participation and collaboration. Other Web sites honored include: Diigo; Facebook; Google Reader; Ning; Second Life; Skype; Twitter; Wikispaces; Wordle; and Zoho. You can find more details about the award on the AASL website, and heres a link to our press release. P.S. I know we don’t deserve an award for timely delivery of our iPhone app so please don’t comment on this â€" the app is scheduled to be submitted to the AppStore this week… Introduce Mind Mapping in Your Classroom Try MindMeister